Strengthening Engagement through Improved Onboarding and Participation for Members in Mental Health Recovery

Organisation

Richmond Fellowship Community Network

Project type

  • Service design

  • Member & staff experience

  • Process improvement

Timeline

4.5 months (2021)

Country

Hong Kong

Overview

The problem

Richmond Fellowship Community Network (RFCN) was a peer-led mental health recovery organisation supporting older people in recovery (PIR). However, over half of its 50 PIR members disengaged quietly, threatening both the organisation’s sustainability and its chances of becoming a certified NGO.

The goal

This project aimed to uncover the root causes of disengagement and co-design low-effort improvements that strengthen engagement and help RFCN sustain its peer-led mission over time.

My role & key stakeholders

As a Service Designer, I framed the opportunity space, adapted research methods to constraints, and co-developed low-fidelity prototypes in partnership with another service designer and RFCN program lead.

Design process

  • Empathise

  • Define

  • Ideate

  • Prototype

  • Testing & implementation (next steps)

Methods

  • Interviews

  • Surveys

  • Field Studies

  • Workshops

Impact

Enhanced member engagement

Enhanced member engagement

Enhanced member engagement

The enhanced experience in onboarding and peer-led activities was expected to increase member engagement by 20-30% by 2022.

Supported RFCN's NGO certification

Supported RFCN's NGO certification

Supported RFCN's NGO certification

Enabled sustainable engagement that contributed to RFCN’s NGO certification in 2023.

Improved mutual communication

Improved mutual communication

Improved mutual communication

Strengthened shared understanding between members and staff around RFCN’s purpose and expectations.

Framing the Design Approach

Co-mapping the ecosystem with RFCN to inform design focus

Why ecosystem map

Why ecosystem map

Why ecosystem map

To clarify the project scope and understand who directly and indirectly shaped the member experience.

What we learned

What we learned

What we learned

The program lead, who stretched in capacity, and peers were the most central to the member experience.

How our learnings helped our next steps

How our learnings helped our next steps

How our learnings helped our next steps

We focused our research and design efforts on RFCN's internal service system, especially the interactions between members and the program lead.

Balancing constraints & care

Design constraints

Design constraints

Design constraints

  • Limited access to members

  • Low tech literacy

  • Minimal staff capacity

Research methods adapted to constraints

  • 1:1 staff interviews

  • Member feedback surveys

  • Field studies in the RFCN centre

How the research helped our next steps

  • To construct the member journey

  • To uncover key friction points both frontstage and backstage

How the insights guided our design principles

  • Low-tech, low-effort and low budget solutions to accommodate the limitations

Why it matters

Adapting to constraints built trust in a sensitive healthcare setting and ensured the solutions were realistic for staff to sustain beyond the project.

My little internal drama

While browsing RFCN’s Facebook page, I was briefly tempted to reach out to a few active members to better understand their first-hand experiences. But doing so would break trust. As a designer, I chose to prioritise ethical integrity and respect for the organisation’s boundaries, even if it meant working with more limited access.

Discovering Insights

Understanding the full experience

To identify the most influential moments for disengagement, based on research insights, we mapped the member journey with RFCN, giving us a holistic view on member's experience, friction points and improvement opportunities.

Zooming in the root causes

The member journey revealed that the most influential breakdowns concentrated on the engagement and retention phase:

  1. Unclear onboarding led to misaligned expectations

Unclear onboarding led to misaligned expectations

  1. Peer-led activities caused stress

Peer-led activities caused stress

Prioritising opportunities

In the workshop with RFCN, we prioritised improving the engagement and retention experience, focusing on onboarding and participation, considering the 4 criteria:

  1. Impact on member experience

Impact on member experience

  1. Effort of staff

Effort of staff

  1. Relevance to the root cause

Relevance to the root cause

  1. Urgency to fix

Urgency to fix

Why it matters

The prioritisation guided us to design low-effort, scalable solutions that could better set expectations, reduce member stress, and strengthen participation within RFCN's capacity.

Improving the Member Experience

Based on the opportunity areas, we engaged RFCN to validate early service concepts with storyboards through a feedback session to assess feasibility. This allowed us to create a shared foundation for potential implementation.

  1. Creating a more welcoming and emotionally supportive space

Proposed improvement

Low-effort environmental changes, such as displaying photos from past gatherings and updating the member contribution wall.

Rationale

The RFCN Centre was a key physical touchpoint in the member journey, but the space lacked emotional connection and cues of inclusion.

Expected outcome

  • Members feel more emotionally supported.

  • Stronger sense of belonging.

  • Increased likelihood of continued participation.

Intended impact

  • Improve member engagement.

  • Stronger community ownership.

  • Greater sustainability of RFCN’s peer-led model.

View Before & After Journey

View Before & After Journey

View Before & After Journey

  1. Creating a clearer and more supportive onboarding experience

Proposed improvement

Introduce lightweight tools like a welcome card, an orientation poster, and a peer-facilitated welcome moment.

Rationale

Onboarding, as the first interaction with RFCN, shapes expectations and long-term engagement (Primacy Effect).

Expected outcome

  • New members feel more informed and supported from the start.

  • Expectations are better aligned early on.

Intended impact

  • Improve member engagement.

  • Support RFCN’s sustainable peer-led model.

View Before & After Journey

View Before & After Journey

View Before & After Journey

  1. Creating a low-pressure path to leading activities

Proposed improvement

Introduce lighter ways for members to contribute, such as a buddy system, activity toolkits for planning and facilitation, and a ritual of recognition after each activity.

Rationale

Members felt tremendous stress leading activities, leading to disengagement.

Expected outcome

  • Members feel more supported and confident.

  • Staff spend less time preparing and facilitating every session themselves.

Intended impact

  • Improve member engagement.

  • Develop a stronger culture of mutual support and shared responsibility.

  • Strengthen RFCN’s sustainable peer-led model.

View Before & After Journey

View Before & After Journey

View Before & After Journey

Across all the 3 key improvements, we focused on small, low-effort changes that are expected to improve member confidence, emotional connection, and engagement, while staying realistic for RFCN to maintain. In the longer term, they are expected to support RFCN’s goals of community integration and readiness for NGO certification.

Next Steps

Supporting RFCN to test with members

The next step would be test the co-created improvements with members to understand how they respond in real contexts and identify areas for refinement.


To help RFCN run the pilot within their limited capacity, we would provide a support toolkit, including an observation checklist, simple prompts for member feedback, and a flexible testing timeline.


This approach helped keep testing manageable while enabling real-world insights and iteration. It would also build staff's confidence to lead future improvements independently.

Learnings

Be water in constraints

Working with limited member access, low tech literacy, and minimal resources pushed me to adapt and stay flexible. These challenges helped me design with focus and purpose, a mindset I’ll carry into future projects with similar limitations.

Be mindful of ethical concerns in healthcare contexts

Working with vulnerable members reminded me that protecting boundaries is just as important as uncovering insights. This strengthened my ethical awareness, something I’ll carry into future projects involving trust and sensitivity.

This project taught me that small, thoughtful changes can plant the seed for lasting impact. In 2023, RFCN became a certified NGO, a milestone I’m proud to have contributed to.

∗ ∗ ∗

Thanks for making it this far. Since this project, I’ve developed a growing interest in designing for social impact. It reminded me that good design doesn’t just solve problems: it brings a human touch, strengthens trust, and makes everyday systems feel more supportive and inclusive.


If this resonates with you, I’d love to connect and keep the conversation going.

Let's connect ~

I'd like to listen to your story too!

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

© 2025 Shandi Leung

Let's connect ~

I'd like to listen to your story too!

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

© 2025 Shandi Leung

Let's connect ~

I'd like to listen to your story too!

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

  • ❋ Look forward to meeting you ❋

© 2025 Shandi leung